If you could go back through time at a rate of one year per second, it would take you more than 115 years to reach the dawn of life on Earth around 3.8 billion years ago. You would be disappointed with what you found.
Friday, 27 September 2013
Wednesday, 25 September 2013
Beneficial Bacteria – The Biome in Your Belly
Most people think of
bacteria as something to be avoided. We steer clear of shaking hands with a
sick co-worker, we filter and treat our water, and some of us even carry around
little bottles of hand sanitizer. The war on microbes is both ubiquitous and illusory. You can certainly take measures to avoid harmful germs but you
will never be able to completely rid yourself of bacteria, nor would you want
to.
Mary Roach said it
best in her newest page-turner Gulp:Adventures on the Alimentary Canal, “Like people, bacteria are good or bad
not so much by nature as by circumstance.” You have loads of bacteria in your
ears, mouth, nose, throat, and gut and each of them either serves a useful
function or doesn’t cause you any harm at all. That is unless you put them
somewhere they aren’t supposed to be. For example, take a few Streptococcus bacteria from your throat
(where the worst they will cause is a sore throat) and put them in your
bloodstream and you will swiftly find yourself dying from necrotizing fasciitis,
AKA flesh eating disease.
One place where
bacteria seem to be the body’s greatest ally is in your colon. They aid in
digestion, produce vital nutrients, and even help kill invader bacteria.
Scientists are only now really beginning to appreciate the full-fledged
ecosystem that exists inside your large intestine. And when I say “your” I mean
it. Each person is host to their own custom mix of bacteria. It’s easy to think
of them as parasites living off of your digestive tract, but in a very real
sense they help make you, you.
Unfortunately, being
you is not always a thrill. Even those of us with strong stomachs will get laid
up with gas, bloating, or diarrhea at some point, no matter how careful we are
about our health. In the worst cases, we can open the gate to evil bacteria
that can produce chronic problems by overpowering your custom-built intestinal
police force and hijacking your innards to cause you harm.
One of the worst
examples is the bacterial infection C.
difficile. This bacteria, which is most prevalent in hospitals, can set up
shop in your colon and cause you all kinds of problems. The most embarrassing
and life altering can be a persistent inability to… how can I put this?… trust
a fart. The standard treatment is a course of anti-biotics, but for every
course of treatment that doesn’t completely wipe them out, your chance of
relapse doubles.
When all else fails
there is one treatment that is almost guaranteed to work. The problem is, it is equal parts captivating and disgusting. The idea is to take the bacterial
ecosystem from someone else’s colon and grow a replica in the infected person.
It all sounds very scientific until you realize that it is called fecal
bacteriotherapy and you find out how it is achieved…
First, the patient is
given a run of powerful antibiotics to kill pretty much every bacterium in
their colon. Next, a donor (anyone with a healthy gut) is asked to (I am trying
to choose my words carefully here) collect a sample of their own detritus. The
sample is then blended (yes, with a blender) and administered into the sick
person’s large intestine. It may sound gross (once you figure out what I’m
talking about) but in 93% of cases it works. The bacteria from the healthy
person colonize the troublesome colon and health is restored in a matter of
hours. A welcome relief for a person who may have previously been unable to
leave their own home for fear of an embarrassing intestinal event.
Your body is an
amazing partnership of organs and organisms. Finding and maintaining a healthy
balance is the key to living a long and enjoyable life. But even if you’re not
preoccupied with increasing longevity or running a marathon, you have one
powerful incentive to try and maintain a fit digestive tract: Nobody wants a poop transplant.
Friday, 20 September 2013
Sketchy Fact #7 - Large Mammals That Get Called into Existence
The Blue Whale is the biggest animal to have ever lived on Earth, that humans are aware of. It weighs 70 tonnes more than the biggest dinosaur ever discovered – Agrentinosaurus (170 tonnes and 100 tonnes respectively).
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
Forest Bathing: Not Just for Homeless People, Anymore
What have
trees ever done for anybody, anyway? Sure they help us build ships, tables, paper and a bunch of other things that make civilization possible, but that
stuff all comes from chopping them down. In today’s increasingly ‘green’
culture, you always hear about saving the rainforest and protecting nature in
general, but does leaving trees standing actually benefit any person?
The
answer is a resounding and irrefutable “Yes.” Quite obviously they help improve the air quality and the recycling of oxygen to help us breathe. As an added plus, they are also quite nice to look at. However, it also turns out that they may be helping beyond what is obvious.
Shinrin-yoku
– literally “Forest Bathing” – is a Japanese concept introduced by the nation’s
Forest Agency in 1982 as a means to promote healthy and active lifestyles. Though
they didn’t have the science to support it at the time, the people behind the
initiative felt that there must be some benefit to spending time in nature,
because quite frankly it seemed too pleasant not to be good for you.
In recent
years Dr. Qing Li – associate professor in the Department of Hygiene and Public
Health at Tokyo’s Nippon Medical School – has begun to provide the hard proof
to back forest bathing.
Researchers
have known for quite a while that time spent in nature helps us to relax. When we
watch the waves roll in off the ocean or take in a big, spicy lung-full of
mountain air, the pressures of modern life seem to wash away. Psychological
research has shown that people who spend time in nature often perform better on
mental tasks than those who try to relax in the city. They are also rated
higher on measures of basic effectiveness.
Dr. Li’s work has gone one step further and measured actual responses the body
makes to kicking back in the woods. Participants in his studies – though some might
prefer to call them vacations – have demonstrated reduced stress hormones and improved stability in their heart rate. They were even more reactive to
changes in their environment.
This is
all well and good, but there is one result from forest bathing research that
almost seems too amazing to believe. Dr. Li and his students have observed
enhanced immune system activity and greater numbers of cancer-fighting cells in
their forest-bound guinea pigs.
That
almost seems to go too far. You had me with lower stress and better attention,
Dr. Li; but a walk in the woods as cancer treatment? What do you take me for?
Once
again, cue Qing Li with hard science to support his claims. Leaving the woods
and heading into the lab, Dr. Li has shown that phytoncides, which are
chemicals produced and emitted into the air by trees through their wood oils,
can induce human “Natural Killer” cell activity. Natural killer cells are far
better than they sound. The killing they do is of cancer. It’s like Terminator
2.
This work
has been supported by other researchers as well. In a study of cancer-laden lab
rats, the subjects living in a care-free phytoncide-rich environment had slower tumor growth and their tumors were 40% smaller compared to their regular lab compatriots.
A good
scientist will never tell you that they have proven something beyond all doubt,
but sometimes the evidence speaks for itself. Next time you have a choice
between a jog on the treadmill or a run through the forest, you might want to
opt for the latter. Not only will you feel less stressed and more effective, but your cancer might not grow as fast, either.
Friday, 13 September 2013
Sketchy Fact #6: Mammoth Pyramid Scheme
The last wooly mammoth died in about 1700 BC, about 850 years after the Great Pyramid of Giza was completed. It was pygmy mammoth that was about as tall as an average man (1.71 m) and lived on the Channel Islands in the Bering Sea.
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Adam and Eve – The snake-free version that actually happened
Every so often in
science you come across a fact that is at the same time strikingly obvious and
obviously striking. The most memorable example I can think of in my own life
was the day that I learned that Adam and Eve were real people.
Before we let our
imaginations get the best of us, let’s stop and recognize that I am not talking
about the biblical Adam and Eve. It doesn’t take a brilliant mind to see that
two people with three sons would have a hard time spawning the rest of humanity
without some serious and deleterious in-breeding going on. No, I am talking
about the two people known to science as Y-chromosomal Adam and Mitochondrial
Eve. Although it is all but certain that they never crossed paths, these two
people are literally the direct ancestors of every person alive today.
In a way, it is
common sense. Since every living thing on Earth shares a common ancestor (if
you go back far enough in time) there must be a point at which all human
bloodlines converge. Yet, this is one of those cases where common sense can
still knock you off your feet.
To really
understand what I’m talking about, you need to understand something about
genetics (don’t worry, it’s a simple idea). Basically when a man and a woman do
the horizontal hustle and produce a baby, it is largely a product of both of
their DNA. Genetic material from the man mixes from that of the woman and gets
recombined to make a new genetic code that is similar to but different from the
genetic code of each parent. That is how most genetic change happens, but it
isn’t the only way.
The alternative
is mutation. As we have seen in previous articles (mitosis,
epigenetics, and radioactivity) mutation can happen as a result of things we
are exposed to (radiation, diet, etc.) but it can also happen naturally.
Natural mutation happens at a fairly steady rate that has been estimated at
0.00000003 mutations per generation.
Y-chromosomal Adam, as the name suggests, is the man from whom all living men have inherited
their Y-chromosomes. Since only men carry Y-chromosomes, they are only passed
on by fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers etc. and they are not
influenced by DNA from mothers. As a result, the only way the Y chromosome ever
changes is through mutation.
This is not just
a logical idea; it is something scientists have demonstrated. By looking at the
Y-chromosomes of men from all over the world and counting the number of
mutations, researchers have estimated that “Adam” probably lived sometime
around 100,000 years ago in Africa. He was probably more concerned with
outrunning hyenas than fathering 3.5 billion sons, but somehow he managed to
pull it off.
We can use a
similar idea to determine how long ago the mother of all humans lived,
too. Instead of using Y-chromosomes, scientists have looked at mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA is a separate set of DNA that doesn’t really belong to
you but is found in every one of your cells. You see, every cell contains organisms
called mitochondria which convert food into energy. The weird thing is,
billions of years ago, mitochondria were totally separate and independent from
cells. At some point, they made a deal with the organisms that would become
cells where they would live inside them and provide energy to their hosts. They
never fully integrated though, and to this day mitochondria still replicate on
their own schedule and have their own DNA.
Sperm don’t have
mitochondria, but eggs do. The upshot is that, whether you are a man or a
woman, you got all your mitochondria from your mom. Similar to Y-chromosomes,
this DNA only changes through mutation and, as a result, we can trace it back
to the point where all human bloodlines converge. It turns out Mitochondrial
Eve lived about 200,000 years ago, also in Africa.
These were the
numbers that were generally accepted until a couple weeks ago. It turns out
that two teams of researchers working independently of one another have revised
the age estimates of the mother and father of humanity. Their work suggests
that Adam lived between 120,000 and 200,000 years ago and Eve lived sometime between 99,000 and 200,000 years ago.
Look at those
numbers again. It is pretty amazing. The ranges now overlap. That means that
the two people at the root of all human DNA might have even been alive
at the same time on the same continent. Admittedly, it isn’t very likely but
the possibility is amazingly cool. At some point there may have been two people
who never knew each other and never spoke to one another and probably were
never within a few hundred miles of one another; but through a brilliant streak
of genetic luck, they produced every single one of us. Chew on that for a
while, cousin.
Friday, 6 September 2013
Sketchy Fact #5: Atomic Baseball
Atoms are 99.999% empty space. If you blew one up to the size of a baseball stadium, the nucleus would be the size of a fly on the pitcher’s mound and the electrons would be buzzing in the parking lot.
(It's impossible to occupy the same state)
Wednesday, 4 September 2013
Solar Power: Not Just for Hippies, Anymore
Wouldn’t it be great
if somebody invented a free source of power that anyone could use to power
their lives? Ideally it would be an entity of pure energy positioned in the sky
so we could all make use of it. If you made it big enough and powerful enough
you could even put it 150,000,000 km’s away.
Fortunately for humans,
the laws of physics have done the job for us and the bright, hot, skin bronzing
power plant we call the Sun has been powering our planet since its fusion
switch was first flipped on around 5 billion years ago. Unfortunately, we
humans really suck at taking advantage of it.
Give a plant a steady
stream of sunlight and it will work wonders. Plants can take the particles of
light given off by the sun (photons) and directly use them as food. Photons
power plant growth as well as photosynthesis, which is something all of us
air-breathers should be thankful for. Since every food chain on the planet
begins with plants, it is easy to see how the whole notion of “food” is based
on transferring the sun’s energy from one body to another. Compared to plants, we
humans are solar sissies.
The trouble with
people is that having enough energy to power our bodies just doesn’t cut it
anymore. We also need to power our houses, cars, computers, iPods, robot
vacuums, dancing Santa’s and all the other things that modern life would be
impossible without. It turns out that coaxing the sun into juicing our
electronics for us is trickier than it might at first seem.
Conventional solar
cells do a remarkably bad job turning photons into useful energy. Your average
solar panel has an efficiency of about 20% - meaning that only 20% of the
energy input (light) is converted into useful output. The way they work is
complicated but basically you take some semi-conductive material (usually
silicon (Si)), form it into a sheet, wire it up, and place it in the sun. Photons
excite the electrons in the material, knocking them loose and sending them off
to do useful things. To get electrons to do what you want, you need to create a
current for them to flow along.
Where you will run
into trouble is primarily in 2 places: the nature of light itself, and willfully moving
electrons. As anyone who has ever seen a rainbow can tell, light comes in
different wavelengths – each represented by a different colour. Different
wavelengths have different amounts of energy. Only a small proportion of the
Sun’s light has the exact amount of energy needed to excite electrons in a
given material (ex. silicon). If a photon doesn’t have enough energy, it won’t
knock any electrons loose. If it has too much energy, it uses just the amount
is needs to nudge an electron and the rest is wasted. In the end, you lose
about 70% of the possible energy in a beam of light to this problem. Even when
you manage to get your electrons going and try to move them from one place to
another, you lose energy if the distance is too far or if they are flowing
through something that isn’t a very good conductor.
The upshot of these
limitations is that you usually need a whole lot of solar panels if you want to
power anything beyond a calculator with reliability. Recently, though, there
has been some cause for optimism. Researchers at Caltech led by Dr. Harry A.Atwater have created a commercially viable solar panel that is up to 50%
efficient. That still may not sound great, but it represents a massive leap
forward in solar energy.
Dr. Atwater and his
team, working under the company name Alta Devices, have done away with silicon
and instead build their cells from gallium arsenide (GaAs). The researchers argue that
this material builds purer crystals than silicon (increasing efficiency),
absorbs more photons, and produces more energy than conventional solar panels.
On top of that, they have engineered their devices to recycle unused photons
and be 1/40 the thickness of a human hair, making them doublely useful and ridiculously
flexible. A few other innovations offer promise in creating more efficient solar cells including organic polymers and dye-sensitized materials that can absorb more photons.
Arun Das, PhD student at the University of Waterloo’s
Autonomous Vehicles Lab, told Sketchy Science that, “low weight solar
cells are very exciting. We would no longer be constrained to using [solar panels]
on rooftops and solar farms. We could soon see solar cells as a viable option for
charging our smartphones, extending the range of electric cars, and powering
small unmanned rescue drones in disaster scenarios.”
As you can imagine, the impact all this
would have on fossil fuel emissions would be immense. But that pales in
comparison to the benefits of being able to watch The Biggest Loser in the
middle of the woods.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)