People and dogs have had an interesting and complicated relationship since the dawn of civilization. Ever since the first wolf worked up the courage to take food out of a person's hand our two species have been trying to figure each other out. We have moulded the original overly-tame wolves (and yes, all dogs are descended from wolves) into hundreds of different dog breeds of all shapes and sizes. We know which dog to call on to herd sheep, the best for hauling in fishing lines, and which dog to put front and centre in a fire engine. However, for everything we know about the dogs we have created; we have been historically deficient in knowledge of the animals we have left behind.
Considering how much we love dogs, wolves have had a surprisingly rough go. Throughout history people have grown to fear wolves and have hunted them to the brink of extinction. Flip through any animal-based fairy tale book and you will find a disproportionately large number of stories featuring wolves as villains. We have been happy to think of wolves as ruthless killers, ignoring the fact that they are essentially just bigger, more skittish dogs that are trying to make an honest living in the wild.If you don’t believe that we have been wilfully ignorant of wolves until very recently, consider the fact that the one thing that most people know about wild wolf packs is blatantly wrong. Ask the average person about the social structure of a wolf pack and you will likely get a vague explanation involving the Greek letters alpha and beta. Alpha wolves are the pack leaders; they lead the hunt and keep the betas in their place. They eat first, breed first and are the kings of the castle. The trouble is, they don’t exist.
The alpha wolf theory is based on an observational study undertaken in the 1940’s by biologist Rudolph Schenkel. The theory gained popularity in the 1970's when L. David Mech published his book The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species. Unfortunately, most scientists (including Mech himself) know that they alpha theory is based on faulty extrapolation. Mech has actually been trying to get the book out of print for a number of years.
You see, when Rudy Schenkel was watching wolves and making notes, he overlooked one important fact: the wolves he was studying were in captivity. Their pack was not the kind that formed naturally in the wild; it was made up of adult wolves forced to live together and compete for resources. Not surprisingly these wolves fought a lot and the dominant ones got their pick of food and mates. This study has been compared to learning about the behaviour of human families by observing people living in refugee camps.
This simple revelation has had dramatic consequences for the way people think about training dogs. Generally speaking, people fall into either the dominance camp or the positive reinforcement camp. Unfortunately, when you stop talking about wolves and start talking about dogs, emotions run a lot hotter. No one wants to believe their method of training is cruel, but that is the word that tends to get thrown around. We won't branch out into the world of offering dog training advice. The message we want you to take away from all of this is that things are generally more complicated than they appear, and that wolves are actually a lot more peaceful than you have been led to believe… But you still shouldn't get up in their space… Unless they raised you.
26 comments:
I 1/2 knew this. I knew the family stayed together but I thought they were chosen to be omega/alpha/beta o.e
Your actaully full of shit
Nice rebuttal.
Anonymous says the most profound things. Thank you for this very helpful article.
@anonymous ... that's all the proof you have.
@anonymous ... that's all the proof you have.
This is bs there is Alpha and beta
Please supply the proof-current research? We are open to scientific proof to back up these claims. There is plenty of proof to back up the statements in this article and it is presented in a respectful manner .
I think the other Anonymous is just being a troll and not really meaning anything thing its saying.
Projecting your own cognitive dissonance regarding hierarchy - has no relevance on the actual cooperation of creatures working together for survival & a decent life experience. I find too may humans, too often, to be repulsive & lacking in empathy in regards to all those who share the same common life force arena ...
Alpha does exist though it isn't what people normally believe to be the Alpha male and female are the breeding pair the ones that start the pack. The "Beta" tends to be the siblings to the breeding pair if they have any. The omegas now i'm not positive they exist but if they do it is most likely members that come to join the pack that are not a part of the family. if they don't exist this conclusion is most likely come to when researchers observe the alphas or other members chasing Juvinial males out of the pack so they go find other mates.
You are incorrect. There is no alpha/beta wolf hierarchy. This has been known for decades. Mech has tried to get his book removed from publication for years and years because it is not accurate, however he does not own the rights to it. This myth has been disproved time and time again, it's far easier through DNA analysis nowadays to identify each wolf's relation to one another. Siblings do not accompany a breeding pair of wolves. I'm not sure why this myth is so prevalent outside of the scientific community?
Can we get some real verifiable sources of information please.
The link below leads to a paper by wolf biologist L. David Mech. Within it he states that whilst there is an Alpha male, it is "no more appropriate than referring to a human parent or a doe deer as an alpha. Any parent is dominant to it's young offspring, so alpha adds no information". Essentially he is making the point that an Alpha male wolf is more a kin to the way a child respects his father.
https://web.archive.org/web/20041221073331/http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/mammals/alstat/alpst.htm
Oh so this is where those idiots got those crazy ideas...... This was made a long time ago, theory's can change. But why should all of them hunt? What about the other pups that are closer to being new born? Those are easy prey, I can find many mistakes in this. Yes, they were captive. But think about the wild, the mother can't always watch over them, and if you know, only the main ones can have pups in the pack. But since the mother has to also enforce the "laws" on the others, she can't always watch her pups, so why should anyone else? That's where pup watchers come in. Now, food. Of course anyone can hunt in captivity since it doesn't really matter. But in the wild they need to be that ranked to do it, or it would be problematic since they can over hunt, plus if there are pups, they need watchers to watch over them, and an omega to do other "jobs" and so on, so all can't hunt in the wild. Also, sometimes they wolves in the pack ca be from another pack, since wolves do allow outsiders, it's not always just parents and offspring. You know how humans can be leaders by votes? Well it's kinda the same for wolves, except without the voting. Sometimes wolves will fight another wolf (usually it should be male) for the pack, or one of the offspring fight for the rank, this can happen. Some of this can vary on the breed of wolf since there are a few like the grey wolf, red wolf, maned wolf, etc. Here is a page that gives of the wolves names http://caninebreeds.bulldoginformation.com/wolf-breeds-types.html
And yes, that guy shouldn't have done captive wolves, but wild ones, it was his mistake.
Please don't say that because you didn't include any evidence to support you claim and therefore have no real reason to say anything at all
You're
No wonder these guys stopped writing this blog in 2018. So many people mouthing off (or is it just one who won't give his/her - let's say it's name?)... Just research David Mech, R Schenkle, Alexandra Horowitz, Ray Coppinger for starters. Yes, some material written a while ago - but the study that was used to build the whole dominant alpha myth was carried out in 1947... so which information is new now?
Maned wolves aren't technically wolves though
I just found you guys and i love the blog! Also saw that u guys are back posting! Very awesome
any scientific proof available that the thought of any "alpha male" scenario releases enough endorphins in some human males to trigger an extended need of hanging onto the concept of alpha male for use in generating a morphine like buzz from the self gratifying concept of anthropomorphic alpha male behavior on some human psyche ?
Boy there are some really nasty comments here. One question. Where is the research behind this family theory? So if I am not the Alpha to my dogs what I am, and why do they obey me, why not go off and start a new family?
Frank: read this written by a famous wolf researcher who spent 13 summers at Ellesmere Island studying wolves https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1343&context=usgsnpwrc
and to answer your question on dogs, they may obey you for love and affection, for attention, treats, or the bred-into-them desire to do so (dopamine?). They obey you because you are their instructor and you have taken care of them and fed them and you are -everything- to them. Just like pups might follow their mother and she will correct them by little nips or warnings, you have taken on that role. Without you, their world wouldn't be complete. Also, dogs -do- have a desire to breed and sometimes to escape especially during younger years. This varies from dog to dog though.
So to summarize, to your dogs you are a friend, a mentor, and a parent. These are all figures someone can trust, gives them a sense of safety, of tashty treats :3 . So that's why they love you and obey you and don't abandon you.
I would like to ask for a source on the claim: "males leave to find mates from other packs" I found sites saying that males have a somewhat higher dispersal rate than females but females are more likely to reproduce, just that I haven't found anything about only males leaving. Could this be a typo/left our the word females? Otherwise, I like the work on the blog, keep it up!
Post a Comment